管理必须回归道德！！！
Management must return the moral!!!
作者：姜汝祥博士
Author: Dr. Jiang Ruxiang
　　姜汝祥：锡恩公司首席顾问，经济学硕士、北京大学社会学博士，美国哥伦比亚大学商学院归国学者，享誉业界的《差距》、《请给我结果》等管理畅销书作者。
Jiang Ruxiang: Thynne chief consultant, master of economics, sociology, Peking University, Columbia University School of the United States of America returned scholars, renowned industry" gap"," please give me the results", bestselling author.
在中国一些企业中，员工层与运营管理层的对抗在加剧，比如富士康事件和广丰罢 工事件。这种冲突的根源有很多，但我认为基本原因是经营管理层“权力文化”的形成。
In some enterprises in China, employee layer and management layer confrontation intensified, as Foxconn incident and Guangfeng, industry events. The roots of the conflicts, there are many, but I think the basic reason is the management of power culture "in" formation.
　　任何偏离目标的管理都是“暴 政”
Any deviation from the target management is critical.""
　　企业是一个经济组织，员工与企业之间是一种特殊的交换关系。按照科斯的说法：“企业的显著特征就是作为价格机制的替代物。”也就是说，企业建立的重要原因，就是用合作来代替企业与员工之间的讨价还价，从而节省成本。
Enterprise is an economic organization, the employee and enterprise is a kind of special exchange relationship. According to Coase 's view: " the enterprise is marked as the price mechanism to substitute." That is to say, the enterprise is an important reason, is used to replace the cooperation between enterprise and staff for a supply of sth., thereby saving cost.
　　按照这种逻辑，经营管理层就是这个价格机制的替代物，通过管理层与员工之间的合作，企业可以节省交易成本去实现盈利目标。而盈利目标是合作的前提，任何偏离目标的“管理”，都是一种失去了合法性的“暴 政”。
According to this logic, business management is the price mechanism of substitution, through management and cooperation among employees, enterprises can save transaction cost to achieve profit targets. While the profit target is a prerequisite for cooperation, any deviation from the goal of" management", is a kind of lost legitimacy "cruel".
　　这就是今天发生在相当一批中国企业中的“权力现象”，很多经营管理层按照“自我意志”而不是按照企业目标来管理，而相同的地位与既得利益又会产生“官官相护”，结果就形成了员工与管理层对抗的局面。这个局面，有时候甚至不以企业老板的意志为转移。
This is now taking place in quite a number of Chinese enterprises in the" powers", a lot of business management in accordance with the" self" and not in accordance with the goal of enterprise management, and the same position and vested interest and can produce" officials one another.", the result was the employees and managers to confrontation. This situation, sometimes even to the business owner will transfer.
　　现代企业制度与西方基督教文化背景密切相关。在这种文化背景中，经理人是一种“职业”，这种职业的背后是职业道德与基督教文明的对接，在这种对接之上，职业经理人与员工获得了合作的“灵魂约束”：背离企业目标是不道德的。但这种约束对中国企业显然不存在，因此，传统的儒家学说自然进入了“时代的呼唤”。这种呼唤其实有着一个时代的无奈感：我们现在很多管理上的困境，并不是出于管理问题，而是“道德”层面的问题。问题不是出在做事上，而是出在“做人”上。
Modern enterprise system and the Western Christian culture is closely related to the background. In this cultural context, handler is an" occupation", this occupation is behind the occupation moral and Christian civilization in the docking, docking on occupation, manager and employee to get the cooperation of "soul bound": from corporate goal is immoral. But this kind of restraint on China's enterprises obviously did not exist, therefore, the traditional Confucianism natural entered" the call of the times". The call is a time of frustration: we now many management difficulties, not out of management issues, but the" moral" dimension of the problem. The problem is not in the work, but in the" life".
　　“做人”的准则来源于国学
"Life" of the standard source of Yu Guoxue
　　既然问题出在“做人”上，那么，中国管理就必须回归到最基本的原点，那就是寻根。当我们讲职业化，讲标准，讲流程的时候，很多人都没有感觉，但你把它们转化为仁、礼、义时，大家就有感觉了。
Since the" person", so, Chinese management must return to the most basic starting point, that is the root. When we speak of occupation, speak, speak process time, many people did not feel, but you put them into the kernel, propriety, righteousness, you have the feeling.
　　在员工的角度，从传统的“做人”层面去讨论做事，无疑能够大大减少交易费用。比如当我们把“仁”解释为客户价值，那么，我们就会发现，“已欲立而立人，已欲达而达人，是仁也。”这样的警句说的不就是与客户的关系吗？！
In their perspective, from the traditional" personhood" level to discuss things, it can greatly reduce the transaction costs. For example, when we put the" benevolence" explanation for the customer value, then, we will find that," has to stand sets up the people, has been up to and master, is benevolent." This motto says is not the relationship with customers?!
　　同样，礼是天之法则，人之规则。“一旦克已复礼，天下归仁焉”讲的就是职业化，就是“对规则的敬畏”，当每个团队做到仁义之师，公司做到礼仪之邦，我相信管理就不会那么复杂，社会也不会那么混乱了。
The same day, Li is the rule, the rule. " If G has complex ceremony, all kueijen behavior" is about occupation, is" to awe the rules", when each team to an army of justice, company to achieve a state of ceremonies, I believe that the management is not so complex, the society will not be so confused.
　　牋当然，中国现代企业制度的建立，不可能通过简单的复古来解决。但是当传统文化纽带断裂造就了我们这样一批“无根的一代”、当经济强盛代替“文化之我”、当每个人回答“钱就是我”之时，这种无根的“我”获得的只能是短暂的自恋，而在这种短暂自恋的狂欢之后，是组织管理危机的逼近。
I of course, China is the establishment of modern enterprise system, not possible through a simple retro to solve. But when the traditional cultural tie break we created a batch of such" rootless generation", when the economy is strong instead of " cultural I", when everyone said "money is me ", the" I" root access is only transient narcissism, and in such a short narcissistic Carnival later, organizational management crisis looming.
　　中国企业目前所面临的主要矛盾，就是这种认同危机，而这种认同危机深深根植于传统与现代的断裂之中。我把这种矛盾归结为：有根的市场经济与无根的市场经济之间的矛盾，或者叫有道德的市场经济与无道德的市场经济之间的矛盾。
Chinese enterprises facing the main contradiction, is the identity crisis, and this crisis of identity is deeply rooted in traditional and modern fracture. I put this kind of contradiction as follows: a market economy and the root of market economy the contradiction between, or moral market economy and moral of market economy the contradiction between.
　　我想，这就是新国学管理的时代意义。新国学管理的要求很简单，那就是把西方管理体系对接中国文化之根，中国文化不能没有自己的根，中国企业不能没有自己的管理模式，中国的市场经济必须是有道德的市场经济。
I think, this is the new management era significance of ancient Chinese literature search. The new management of ancient Chinese literature search request is very simple, that is the western management system butt Chinese cultural root, Chinese culture must have its own root, Chinese enterprises must have their own mode of management, China 's market economy must be a moral market economy.