国家实验室认可流程
The national laboratory accreditation process
1 、国家实验室认可初次认可
In 1, the National Laboratory Accreditation initial recognition
　　1.1 国家实验室认可意向申请
1.1 National Laboratory Accreditation the intention to apply
　　申请人可以用任何方式向CNAS 秘书处表示认可意向，如来访、电话、传真以及其他电子通讯方式。CNAS 秘书处应向申请人提供最新版本的认可规则和其他有关文件。
The applicant can be used in any way to the CNAS secretariat said that recognition intent, such as visit, telephone, fax and other means of electronic communication. The CNAS Secretariat shall provide the applicant with the latest version of the recognition rules and other relevant documents.
　　1.2 国家实验室认可正式申请
1.2 National Laboratory Accreditation formal application
　　1.2.1 申请人应按CNAS 秘书处的要求提供申请资料，并交纳申请费用。
1.2.1 applicants should according to the CNAS Secretariat 's request for application data, and pay the application charge.
　　1.2.2 CNAS 秘书处审查申请人正式提交的申请资料，若申请人提交的资料齐全、填写清楚、正确，对CNAS 的相关要求基本了解，质量管理体系正式运行超过6 个月，且进行了完整的内审和管理评审，申请人的质量管理体系和技术活动运作处于稳定运行状态，聘用的工作人员符合有关法律法规的要求。则可予以正式受理，并在3 个月内安排现场评审（申请人造成延误除外）；否则，应进一步了解情况，需要时，征得申请人同意后可进行初访（费用由申请人负担），以CNAS-GL01：2006 第 6 页 共 13 页 2006 年06 月01 日发布 2006 年07 月01 实施确定申请人是否具备在3 个月内接受评审的条件。如申请人不能在3 个月内接受评审，则应暂缓正式受理申请。
1.2.2 CNAS Secretariat to review the application materials submitted by the applicant formally, if the applicant submit complete information, clearly, correctly, on the relevant requirements of CNAS basic knowledge, quality management system operation more than 6 months, and had a complete internal audit and management review, the quality management system and technical operations in stable operation state, staff in accordance with the relevant laws regulations. Can be formally accepted, and within 3 months of on-site review ( applicant resulting in delayed exception); otherwise, should further understand the situation, when necessary, ask the applicant agrees to visit ( can be done after the costs borne by the applicant ), with CNAS-GL01: 2006 sixth page 13 of 06 2006 01 issued in 2006 of 07 months 01 is implemented to determine whether the applicant has in within 3 months of receiving accreditation conditions. If the applicant can not be within 3 months of receiving accreditation, formally accepting the application shall be suspended.
　　1.2.3 在资料审查、走访过程中CNAS 秘书处应将所发现的与认可条件不符合之处通知申请人，不做咨询。
1.2.3 in the review process, visit the CNAS Secretariat should be discovered and recognized condition does not conform to that notice to the applicant, not to do consulting.
　　1.2.4 当申请人申请进行检测、校准或其他能力的认可，必须提供参加了至少一项适宜的能力验证计划、比对计划或测量审核的证明。只有在申请人证明参加了能力验证活动且表现满意，CNAS 方予以受理。
1.2.4 when the applicant for detection, calibration or other ability approbate, must provide at least one suitable for proficiency testing program, compared with the plan or measurement audit evidence. Only when the applicant participated in ability testing activity and satisfactory performance, Party CNAS shall accept.
　　1.3 评审准备
Preparation of 1.3 review
　　1.3.1 CNAS 秘书处以公正性和非歧视性的原则指定评审组，并征得申请人同意，如申请人基于公正性理由对评审组的任何成员表示拒绝时，秘书处经核实后
1.3.1 CNAS Secretariat to fair and non-discriminatory principles specify evaluation group, and with the consent of the applicant agrees, if the applicant based on fairness on the grounds of any member of the group of evaluation of refusal, the secretariat after verification
　　应给予调整。
Should be given to adjust.
　　1.3.2 评审组审查申请人提交的质量管理体系文件和相关资料，当发现文件不符合要求时，秘书处或评审组应以书面方式通知申请人采取纠正措施。秘书处根据评审组长的提议，认为需要时，可与申请人协商进行预评审。预评审只对资料审查中发现的需要澄清的问题进行核实或做进一步了解，不做咨询，但须向秘书处提交书面的预评审报告。在申请人采取有效纠正措施解决发现的主要问题后，评审组长方可进行现场评审。
1.3.2 review group to review the applicant to submit the documents of quality management system and related information, when it is discovered that the documents do not meet the requirements, the secretariat or review group should be written notice to the applicant to take corrective measures. The Secretariat according to the leader's proposal, if considered necessary, the applicant for the preliminary appraisal and consultation. A review of data only found in examination of issues need to be clarified to verify or for further understanding, not to do consulting, but shall submit to the Secretariat in writing a review report. The applicant to take effective corrective measures to solve the main problem of discovery, evaluation group to conduct on-site review.